Tag Archives: Sustainable

Clean Seed Capital Group (TSX.V-CSX) is pleased to announce it will be exhibiting at the 15th Annual Pacific Agriculture Show, Abbotsford, BC, January 24-26, 2013


January 14, 2013


Clean Seed Capital Group is pleased to announce it will be exhibiting at the 15th Annual Pacific Agriculture Show, held at the Tradex Exhibition Center (Abbotsford Airport) Abbotsford, BC, January 24-26,2013

The company will be Introducing the ”DART“, its new small holder No- Till equipment designed for small to medium farming operations. Find them at Booth #543.

The show will showcase the latest and most innovative equipment and technology for the agriculture industry. Join thousands of farmers and agri-food producers.

Clean Seed Capital Group Ltd, publicly traded on the Toronto Venture Exchange (CSX: TSXV), is at the forefront of an ecological movement that strives to balance productivity with sustainability and is uniquely positioned to contribute to and benefit from a rapidly emerging market opportunity in the sustainable agricultural sector.

The company owns an innovative, patent-protected precision no-till planting system and is emerging as a technology-based catalytic agent in the sustainable agriculture sector.

Clean Seed Capital Group Closes Private Placement


December 12, 2012

NEWS RELEASE

Clean Seed Closes Private Placement

December 12, 2012 – further to its news release dated December 5, 2012, Clean Seed Capital Group Ltd. (the “Company”) (TSX-V: CSX) announces that it has received TSX Venture Exchange approval to the closing of its private placement. The Company has raised an aggregate $510,000 through issuance of 2,550,000 units at a price of $0.20 per unit (“Unit”).

Each Unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant (a “Warrant”). Each whole Warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one common share of the Company for a period of 24 months from the closing date at a price of $0.30 per share in the first 12 months and $0.40 in the 12 months thereafter.

A finder’s fee of $5,000 was paid in connection with the private placement closing. The securities issued in relation to this financing are subject to regulatory four month hold period expiring April 13, 2013.

The proceeds from this financing will be used to advance the Company through to commercialization as well as general working capital.

For further information please contact Mark Tommasi at 604-566-9895 and visit our website at www.cleanseedcapital.com.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

Graeme Lempriere

CEO, President and Director

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

No-Till Advances Conservation Efforts. “Sustainability is economics, productivity and being socially responsible all wrapped together


December 5, 2012

By Frank Lessiter, Editor

ST. LOUIS, Mo. (Nov. 29, 2012) — In looking at all of the major developments in American agriculture over the past 75 years, no-till has to be ranked close to the top. The growth of no-till has played a tremendous role in reducing costly erosion on much of the nation’s cropland.

In 1982, some 40% of the country’s cropland was eroding at an alarming rate as most growers were still relying on moldboard plows and heavy discs for intensive tillage. That was the same year that the Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC) in West Lafayette, Ind., was organized.

The nonprofit public and private partnership’s goal was to provide a central clearing house where farmers, suppliers, government agencies and organization could find the latest information on various conservation programs. The organization has certainly lived up to its goal, as numerous achievements made by CTIC over the past 30 years serve as a model of what can be accomplished around the world when it comes to conservation efforts.

Right from the start, the group saw many advantages of getting more farmers to start no-tilling. When CTIC become a reality, 11.5 million acres of U.S. cropland were no-tilled, an increase from the 3.3 million acres that were no-tilled in 1972 when No-Till Farmer was first published. The latest USDA estimates indicate about 92 million acres were no-tilled in 2012.

During a recent CTIC 30th-anniversary meeting, a panel discussion zeroed in on what has happened during the past 3 decades in terms of progress in the conservation area. The five panel members agreed that no-till was the most significant development to take place in agriculture since World War II. Yet at the same time, other developments in American agriculture made it possible for no-till to grow as rapidly as it has and demonstrated the value of taking a systems approach with reduced tillage.

No-Till Grows. Veteran no-tiller Bill Richards from Circleville, Ohio, and his sons have been no-tilling for more than 40 years. The former chief of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) says no-till has allowed the family to boost yields while trimming costs.

“Planting is getting much easier with no-till, and the practice has allowed the country’s farmers to provide more affordable food and fuel to the nation,” says Richards. “A key no-till benefit is that rain falls on residue rather then on bare soil, which dramatically reduces soil erosion.

“No-till also lets farmers effectively farm marginal land. And in this age of encouraging sustainable farming, no-till is way ahead of the curve.”

Bruce Knight, another former NRCS chief, has been no-tilling for more than 10 years on the family’s farm in South Dakota.

“We saw the real benefits of no-till during this year’s drought,” says the owner of Strategic Conservation Solutions in Washington, D.C. “You see the real benefits of how no-till works when it’s part of a bigger food-production system.”

NO-TILL HISTORY. Ohio farmer Bill Richards has seen no-till grow from 3.3 million acres in 1972 to an estimated 92 million acres in 2012. He credits no-till with making farming easier and protecting the soil from costly erosion.

Weed Control. Steve Taylor credits more effective weed control with making no-till possible for many farmers.

“We had to park the tillage equipment and the cultivator,” says the president of the Missouri Agribusiness Coalition and a farmer in central Missouri. “Huge improvements with chemical weed control allowed farmers to dramatically expand no-tilled acres.”

Crop Genetics. New developments with genetic traits over the past 30 years have not only pushed up yields, but led to effective protection against what used to be sizeable losses due to weeds, diseases and insects.

This has allowed growers to make fewer trips across the fields to deal with pests and led to farmers readily adapting more cost-efficient no-till practices.

Mechanization Came Fast. Knight says the major change in his family’s farming and ranching operation after World War II occurred when his father sold the draft horses.

“With mechanization, farmers no longer had to use 20% of their crops to feed the horses,” he says. “The result was that we could provide more food at a reasonable price to feed a growing nation.”

With the increased population around the world, Knight says U.S. farmers will have to dramatically increase productivity. He maintains no-till is one of the best ways to get this done.

GPS Technology. Knight says new precision farming developments have enabled growers to be precise on nearly everything they do in terms of crop production. This area continues to grow with more precision technology developments coming nearly every month.

Equipment Safety. Brent Haglund took a different tact when evaluating major ag developments. The president of the Sand Country Foundation and the Bradley Fund for the Environment in Madison, Wis., credits improved farm-equipment mechanization with playing a role in expanding the country’s conservation-tillage acres. He says developments in farm mechanization and safety improvements have led to fewer trips across fields while making farming much less dangerous.

Water Management. Jane Frankenberger, head of Purdue University’s Extension program in soil and water engineering, credits numerous water-management techniques with helping expand no-till acres. A significant chance is the increased emphasis on tile drainage in solving water-retention concerns and making more effective use of available water.

Working Together. Richards points to CTIC’s long-standing role in forming public-private partnerships to advance conservation tillage. “In 1990, we were failing to meet the requirements of the 1985 Farm Bill,” he recounted. “The Soil Conservation Service (now NRCS) reached out to CTIC and industry and promoted residue management. CTIC was the vehicle to do what government does not do well — marketing and working with partners.”

The concept of partnerships was emphasized repeatedly throughout the panel discussion. Frankenberger pointed out that conservation — not just erosion control, but also management of dissolved pollutants in water flowing from farm fields — will require “strong and robust partnerships that are moving our knowledge base ahead.”

Knight underscored the importance of partnerships. “Almost every success we’ve had in the last 30 years in conservation has been because of partnerships,” he noted.

Sustainability Is Critical. With tightening crop supplies, Knight says more no-till acres are needed to provide the world’s growing population with reasonably priced food, fiber and fuel.

“We must improve our agricultural production to be sustainable,” says Knight. “Sustainability is economics, productivity and being socially responsible all wrapped together.”

When it comes to giving more emphasis to sustainability, that’s a practice most no-tillers maintain they’ve been doing successfully for more than 4 decades.

Momentum continues to build in No-Till


November 15, 2012

 

ag

 

Sometimes it is hard to imagine that no-till started with 7/10 of an acre in Kentucky in 1962. Like a boulder rolling down hill, it slowly picked up momentum and respect. Now finishing its 50th year, it is practiced on more than 35 percent of the acres devoted to the eight major crops in the U.S., and the momentum continues to build.

“By 1994, there were an estimated 39 million acres in no-till,” said Chad Watts, project director, Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC). “By 2004, no-till had grown to 62 million acres. In 2009, the Economic Research Service estimated no-till was practiced on 88 million acres.”

blk and white

Young stands in front of a marker commemorating his beginning endeavors into no-till farming.From the beginning, it is agricultural retailers who supported and championed the cause, recalled Frank Lessiter, chairman, Lessiter Publications, and long time editor of No-Till Farmer. “They got on board early,” he said. “Willard Chemical, Frederick, Md., was one of the leaders. They got into no-till in the late 1960s.”

Lessiter noted the difference between agricultural chemical companies and equipment companies who saw no-till as a threat to their tillage business. The exception was Allis-Chalmers, who put together the first planter designed for no-till. Eventually other companies got on board as well, promoting no-till planters and drills rather than lose that business to another brand.

Lessiter also got on board early, on staff with No-Till Farmer when it started in 1972. For the past 40 years, it has promoted no-till, holding the annual National No-Tillage Conference and continually spreading the gospel of no-till.

“There were 3.3 million acres in no-till when we started the publication,” recalled Lessiter. “What made it work was when we got Roundup for use as a burndown. Weed control was the big problem. Before that, the only burndown we had was paraquat, which didn’t translocate and would kill anything it touched.”

blk1

A Buffalo planter was an early way of ridge tilling and no-tilling.Another problem early adopters of no-till faced was peer pressure. No-till farming was called farming ugly. “A lot of veteran no-tillers will tell you they quit going to the coffee shop in those days because they didn’t want to be hassled,” said Lessiter, who helped turn the look of no-till into a point of pride. “No-tillers would send in pictures to a FARM UGLY contest that we held.”

Like others associated with no-till, Lessiter gave the credit for growth to those early adopters and the farmers who followed in their footsteps. “We gave them the ingredients, but the farmer wrote his own recipe,” he said. “The thing with no-till is you can have two guys across the road from each other, each doing no-till his way, maybe one with coulters and one without. They both make it work, but neither could be successful the other way.”

Lessiter noted that when Roundup Ready crops hit the market, no-till took off again. With precision ag and other tools available today and the economic benefits firmly understood, he doesn’t see the trend slowing down. “When you are talking 10,000 to 20,000 acre operations, those guys don’t want to make multiple trips,” said Lessiter. “With a single pass, you don’t want overlaps or skips of chemicals, seed or fertilizer. With precision technologies, you have controlled traffic. You can strip till in the fall, build berms and apply fertilizer and come right back to the berm in the spring.”

CHANGING ATTITUDES

rocks

Long-term no-till produces soil with strong aggregation and increased structure. The proliferation of fungi in the soil produces glomalin, which acts as a binder, creating soil structure.Some things don’t change, like attitudes toward no-till, pointed out Lessiter. “Many machinery companies make one planter that fits any system, simply modifying it for no-till. Most don’t make a planter specifically for no-till,” he said. “Chemical companies and ag retailers continue to be important supporters of no-till. Syngenta has been a sponsor of our No-Tillage Conference for all 21 years and Bayer CropScience has been a sponsor for 14 years.”

Wal-Mart to promote “precision farming” which uses satellite-guided planting to improve yields and No-Till methods which proponents say reduce soil erosion and maintain land quality.


June 21, 2012

(Reuters) – Wal-Mart Stores Inc has long used its commercial might to forge a global supply chain with ruthless efficiency. It now has a new target: U.S. wheat fields.

walmart

As part of efforts to reduce its carbon footprint and burnish its image as an environmentally responsible company, the huge retailer is sending senior employees into the fields for the first time ever, looking for ways to help farmers reduce their use of carbon-intensive fertilizer or improve logistics.

“We don’t have a lot of visibility in the supply chain, so we started in the field,” says Robert Kaplan, a sustainability manager at the Bentonville, Arkansas-based firm. “I hadn’t seen a wheat field before and I wanted to find out how we go from a green crop in the fields to flour on our shelves.”

This May, Kaplan and a colleague were the first Wal-Mart employees ever to attend the annual crop tour across the No. 1 winter wheat state Kansas, a rite of passage for traders, analysts, academics and buyers for the past 55 years.

The aim is simple: use Wal-Mart’s commercial muscle to get its Great Value-branded flour and wheat products from field to shelf more efficiently, using less carbon.

In the process, however, Wal-Mart may end up initiating transformative changes in the way U.S. farmers grow wheat, lowering costs and improving yields for a crop that has failed to keep pace with the dramatic improvements in sustainability of other commodities such as corn and cotton.

There are some relatively easy wins: convincing more farmers to abandon the practice of plowing their fields after each harvest, and using satellite imagery to optimize fertilizer use.

But the challenge is substantial. Wheat is already one of the least-intensive crops in terms of nitrogen fertilizer, using half as much as corn to produce an acre of grain.

“Wheat is relatively low input. There are not a lot of corners that can be cut,” says Jason Kelley, a wheat and corn extension agronomist at the University of Arkansas.

LAGGING EFFICIENCY

In the last three decades, better farming practices, such as reducing tillage, have resulted in a 15 percent drop in greenhouse gas emissions in each bushel of wheat grown in the United States, according to a soon-to-be-released study by Field to Market, an alliance of national farm groups and more than 40 companies including Cargill and Kellogg’s (but not Wal-Mart) that are seeking to enhance sustainability.

But those gains pale in comparison to other major crops. The amount of water needed to irrigate cotton fields has dropped by 30 percent, according to the study; soil erosion in corn farming has declined by 67 percent since 1980.

As it continues to buy more and more wheat to support its in-house brand, Wal-Mart believes it can use its muscle to bring changes to the agricultural landscape by getting farmers to adopt more progressive techniques and labeling the flour they sell as a sustainable product.

In 2010, Wal-Mart’s store brands had a 4.4 percent share of the $14.35 billion U.S. packaged and industrial bread market, up from a 3.7 percent market share in 2006, according to research firm Euromonitor International.

About 40 percent of U.S. wheat is used for food. Wal-Mart declined to specify how much wheat it buys directly or through its suppliers.

Tim Robinson, the company’s senior buyer of baking commodities, joined Kaplan on the trip.

He said that, while it is still in the fact-finding phase of its wheat work, Wal-Mart is likely to promote “precision farming” which uses satellite-guided planting to improve yields and no-till methods which proponents say reduce soil erosion and maintain land quality.

Roughly 75 percent of wheat farmers plow, or till, their fields in Arkansas, says Kelley. Abandoning that practice could require them to rotate crops regularly and take greater care in planting to avoid stunting plant growth.

“Wheat is one of the later adopters to no-till or zero-till,” said Stewart Ramsey, a senior economist at analytics firm IHS who works with Field to Market.

NEW INEFFICIENCIES

If anyone can drive efficiency into the generations-old practices of U.S. farmers, it’s Wal-Mart.

“Having world class logistics and distribution is the core of their business and what they’ve increasingly been doing is looking to apply those capabilities across the broader supply chain, going further upstream into production and processing,” says Stewart Samuel, a senior analyst at global food and research firm IGD.

The company has embarked on an effort to eliminate 20 million metric tons (22 million tons) of greenhouse gas emissions from its global supply chain by the end of 2015, the equivalent of taking nearly 4 million cars off the road for a year. It declined to say how much of the company’s total emissions that represented.

Last year, the company installed more efficient lighting in its stores in the United States and Mexico and also delivered more goods even as its truck fleet drove fewer miles.

IDEAS SPROUT

May’s crop tour has already yielded new ideas.

As one farmer told Robinson and Kaplan about how he used manure from nearby cattle feedlots to fertilize his fields, they wondered about the feasibility of hauling manure from U.S. poultry producers — predominately in the mid-South — to farmers elsewhere in that region or to the U.S. Corn Belt.

“We’re an expert in transportation. What if we could find empty trucks going from one place to another that will help farmers get something they need?” Robinson said.

Tanner Ehmke, who grows wheat in western Kansas and met with Wal-Mart during the tour, said: “From the farmer’s perspective that is a great idea. Manure is a fantastic fertilizer.”

“The question is whether it would pencil out, costwise,” Tanner said.

He’s not the only one asking that question.

“Hopefully, sustainable flour becomes an everyday business practice,” said Robinson as the tour paused in Wichita, Kansas. “We can’t do this if it costs more.”

The new head of a major research organization says the key to food security is to farm smarter, not to plow more land.


May 28, 2012

frank

 Frank Rijsberman, CEO of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research

The new head of a major research organization says the key to food security is to farm smarter, not to plow more land. The strains on agriculture are growing as the global population rises and emerging economies demand more types of food.

“Agriculture had been neglected for several decades. We had become used to abundant and cheap food. And the world got a wake-up call in 2008, ’10, ’11 with spikes in food prices. And people realized that we have to produce an awful lot more food for a growing world population, as much as 70 percent by 2050,” said Frank Rijsberman, CEO of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, more commonly known as CGIAR.

Right and wrong

The world population is expected to reach 9 billion by 2050, an increase of 2 billion from the current level. But to feed that many people is it simply a matter of planting more seeds on more land?

“No, actually, that’s the wrong way to go because basically crop yields – the amount of crop that we get per hectare has sort of plateaued. It’s no longer increasing. The only thing farmers can do is indeed plow under more land and they’re doing that at an alarming pace. They’re doing that now more rapidly than during the green revolution. But if they do that they’re going to plow under marginal lands, key environmental areas. That would be quite disastrous and not a long-term sustainable path,” he said.

Rijsberman said the key is research to learn how to get greater crop output from existing agricultural land. That’s one of the main goals of CGIAR.

“There’s a lot of private sector research in agriculture, but that serves primarily the big commercial farmers. We are serving the smallholder farmers – the 500 million farmers on less than two hectares – that provide most of the food in developing countries,” he said.

Some of the organization’s key research programs include improving varieties of corn, wheat, rice, potatoes and yams, as well as fish and animals.

A second goal is to get the latest research into the hands of smallholder farmers as quickly as possible. Information such as ways to better access markets and reduce post-harvest loses. Another is to address the issues of climate change, nutrition and gender, since women account for much if not most of the agricultural production around the world.

Rijsberman said while recent spikes in food prices may not hit consumers very hard in developed countries, they can have a devastating effect in poor countries.

“The poor billions in Africa, Asia and Latin America, who spend 80, 90 percent of their income on food – if the food price goes up 10, 20 percent that has an immediate impact. Those people are more vulnerable. Just the recent food price spike from 2010/11 pushed some 44-million more people into poverty. So big impact immediately felt by the most vulnerable,” he said.

The CGIAR is getting ready for the Rio+20 conference on sustainable development. It begins June 20th in Rio de Janeiro. The meeting marks the 20th anniversary of the first so-called Earth Summit. Rijsberman says at the initial summit, agriculture and environment were opposing forces. He describes them now as “best friends.”

lady

At the recent Camp David G8 Summit, President Obama announced the New Alliance on Food and Nutrition Security. It calls for much greater investment and involvement by the private sector. Rijsberman said for Africa to reach its food security goals, agriculture investment would need to increase by $21 billion dollars per year. Most of that would have to come from the private sector.

Story by:Joe DeCapua VOA

Global Agriculture and Food Security Program Announces New Round of Grants to Fight Hunger and Poverty


May 24, 2012

wb

WASHINGTON May 24, 2012 – Partners in the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP), a fund that supports country-led efforts to fight hunger and poverty, today announced that six countries will receive grants totaling $177 million. The grants – to Burundi, the Gambia, Kyrgyz Republic, Malawi, Senegal, and Tanzania – will help each country increase food security, raise rural incomes, and reduce poverty.

International food prices remain volatile and high with the 2011 annual index 24 percent higher than its average in 2010. Prices of certain foods remain dangerously high in many countries, leaving millions of people at risk of malnutrition and hunger, many of them children. In developing countries that face more volatile international markets, it is essential to increase the productivity and resiliency of food production.

“The Global Agriculture and Food Security Program has quickly proven to be one of the most innovative and effective development programs the global community has created,” said Lael Brainard, Under Secretary of the United States Treasury for International Affairs. “GAFSP will raise the incomes of 7.5 million smallholder farmers and their families. These new grants will meet the high global demand for agricultural resources to achieve food security. Continued financial support from the development community is critical to maintaining momentum in the fight to achieve sustainable, lasting solutions to hunger and poverty.”

Launched in April 2010, GAFSP represents a global effort to aid vulnerable populations afflicted by hunger and poverty. It takes up where emergency and recovery assistance leaves off, targeting transformative and lasting change in agriculture and food security within poor countries through financial support to existing aid effectiveness processes.

In Togo, where the agriculture sector contributes 40 percent to GDP, GAFSP support is helping the country to implement their national agriculture plan and has funded seeds, fertilizer, and training for farmers. It has helped farmers to organize better, improved the production of maize and cassava, and increased donor coordination. In Rwanda, one of GAFSP’s first beneficiary countries, the funding is being used to reduce erosion and bolster productivity in hillside agriculture with tremendous results: potato yields are seven times higher than before and cereal yields have quadrupled.

Australia, which was selected as the new chair of the GAFSP Steering Committee, will work to improve the responsiveness of the fund, encourage quality proposals, and attract more donors.

“The program has already achieved significant results and we anticipate a substantial increase in national food security. For instance, in Cambodia GAFSP will help farmers to diversify their crops which will increase incomes, allowing families to feed themselves while obtaining goods and services to improve their nutrition and welfare,” AusAID First Assistant Director General, James Gilling said. “Channeling funding through GAFSP means we can reduce costs and ensure that aid efforts are coordinated, not duplicated.”

The Steering Committee allocated new funds to the following country proposals:

  • In Burundi, GAFSP funds      totaling $30 million will improve water management and irrigation in the      drought-prone regions of Imbo and Mosso, with investments in      infrastructure and agricultural intensification through improved      technologies, productive assets, and the establishment of farmer field      schools.
  • In The Gambia, $28 million in      GAFSP funds will target three highly food-insecure regions via an      integrated area development program that includes land and water      management, horticultural gardens, aquaculture farming, and small ruminant      and poultry farming.
  • In the Kyrgyz Republic, GAFSP has      allocated $16.5 million to support a project that focuses on the      rehabilitation of irrigation and drainage systems, building the capacity      of water user associations, providing agricultural extension services, and      a nutritional component.
  • Malawi will receive $39.6      million to promote irrigated rice and horticulture production as well as      crop diversification and value chain development for selected commodities.
  • In Senegal, $40 million in      GAFSP funds will promote livestock and crop production in three      high-potential, drought-prone zones, including investments focused on:      provision of water management systems, rural roads, vaccination centers,      and financing for model ruminant and poultry operations.
  • Tanzania will receive      $22.9 million to support the rehabilitation of 18,500 hectares of      irrigation schemes designed and managed by local government authorities,      as well as subsidy on rice input packages in the project zones under an      input voucher scheme.

The successful country proposals were selected through a competitive process by the fund’s Steering Committee, which is composed of an equal number of voting members from donor and recipient countries, as well as three representatives from civil society organizations and other stakeholders in a non-voting capacity. The selections were based on recommendations from an independent review conducted by global agriculture experts. Successful country proposals demonstrated a high level of need, a supportive policy environment, and a comprehensive plan for agricultural development.

This is the fourth round of countries to receive funding to support country-driven investment in agriculture and food security through GAFSP. The countries awarded GASFP funding in previous rounds are: Bangladesh, Cambodia, Ethiopia, Haiti, Liberia, Mongolia, Nepal, Niger, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan, and Togo. These investments will help transform the lives of 7.5 million people in rural areas.

“GAFSP funding came at the right time and has allowed us to improve the level of initial funds mobilized for the implementation of the National Agricultural Investment and Food Security Program (PNIASA) which Togo has adopted. It has helped us to stimulate the agricultural sector, which is essential to reviving the national economy”, said Mr. Kossi Messan Ewovor, the Togolese Minister of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries. “The positive results we are already seeing on the ground encourage us to work further for a more active participation of farmers in the program so that it can directly impact on their income. This will have a real impact on agricultural production, economic growth and, ultimately, will allow us to reduce poverty and increase food security.”

To date a total of $1.1 billion has been pledged to GAFSP by Australia, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Canada, Ireland, the Netherlands, South Korea, Spain, and the United States, with funds going to countries that have strategic, innovative and credible plans already in place to improve agricultural productivity and food security. The G8 has recently set a goal of raising $1.2 billion in further contributions to GAFSP over 3 years.

Contacts:

In Washington: Amy Stilwell, (202) 458-4906, astilwell@worldbank.org;

Kimberly Parent, (202) 458-5623, kparent@worldbank.org

For more information, please visit: www.gafspfund.org

Visit us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/worldbank

Be updated via Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/worldbank

For our YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/worldbank

UN calls for science-led ‘ever-green’ agricultural revolution.


February 2, 2012

un

1 February 2012 | By Alistair Driver

THE UN has called on international Governments to create a 21st Century ‘ever-green revolution’ for agriculture that would aim to double production, while protecting the earth’s resources.

In a new report on global sustainable development, the UN highlights the importance of international investment in agricultural science, including biotechnology, to achieve these goals.

“Governments and international organizations should work to create a new green revolution — an “ever-green revolution” — for the twenty-first century that aims to at least double productivity while drastically reducing resource use and avoiding further loss of biodiversity, topsoil loss and water depletion and contamination,” the report’ ‘Resilient People, Resilient Planet: A Future Worth Choosing’, recommends.

It says this should be achieved partly through the ‘scaling-up of investment in agricultural research and development, to ensure that cutting-edge research is rapidly moved from laboratory to field’.

“The new agricultural revolution should focus on sustainable intensification (practices with low external inputs, emissions and wastes) and on crop diversification and resilience to climate change,” the report says.

It adds that ‘new green biotechnologies’ could play a ‘valuable role in enabling farmers to adapt to climate change, improve resistance to pests, restore soil fertility and contribute to the diversification of the rural economy’.

The report says the task should be co-ordinated by the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO).

With three-quarters of the world’s poor living in rural areas and 2.5 billion rural inhabitants involved in agriculture, it says an ‘immediate push on sustainable agriculture would yield enormous social, economic and environmental dividends’.

But the report, compiled by a 22-member panel of sustainable development experts, including former heads of state and ministers, warns that current efforts to achieve sustainable development lack political will and are neither fast enough nor deep enough.

The report is published ahead of the UN Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) in Brazil in June.

Crop Protection Association (CPA) chief executive Dominic Dyer urged EU leaders to respond to the report by recognising the ‘critical role of plant science innovation in boosting crop yields, preventing harvest losses and enabling more efficient use of key resources such as land, energy and water’.

“The EU-27 is one of the world’s major food producing economies, yet current policies on issues such as CAP reform, research investment and access to agricultural innovation do not reflect the pressing global need to produce more food.

“Even by 2030, less than 20 years away, this latest UN report estimates that the world will need 50 per cent more food, 45 per cent more energy and 30 per cent more water. However much we strive to reduce waste, improve distribution or change consumption patterns, there is no escaping the urgent need to boost agricultural productivity – especially in regions expected to be less vulnerable to the production-limiting effects of climate change, such as northern Europe.

“European agriculture can be a key player in the new political economy called for by the UN’s high-level panel – but only if EU leaders wake up to the urgent need to embrace developments in agricultural science and innovation,” said Mr Dyer.

The long-term solution must be to promote truly sustainable agriculture both in small-holdings, which continue to produce the majority of Africa’s food, and large-scale commercial farms.


November 27, 2011

farmer

By John Kufuor
Nothing better illustrates the crucial role that science must play in farming in Africa than the contrasts in agricultural productivity between our continent and the world as a whole. For while food productivity has increased globally by 140 per cent in recent decades, the figures for sub-Saharan Africa over the same period show a fall.

This is not because of any lack of effort by Africa’s farmers. Agriculture remains for far too many an exhausting dawn to dusk occupation for very little reward. Indeed, it is because farming across much of the continent has changed little in generations that the role of science is so important.

For what these dismal figures underline is how Africa’s agriculture has been cut off from the scientific advances which have transformed yields in many other parts of the globe. The breakthroughs on crop varieties, fertilisers and pesticides, coupled with new agricultural techniques which are now taken for granted elsewhere, have remained out of the reach of African farmers.

So, too, has the investment to put them into action. We can see the impact of this neglect across our continent. One in three people in sub-Saharan Africa are chronically hungry, the highest proportion in the world. Many more suffer from consistently poor diets.

Malnutrition is a catastrophic brake on progress, damaging every aspect of life. Malnutrition throughout pregnancy and childhood stunts development, increasing vulnerability to disease and reducing capacity to learn at school.

All of this feeds into the wider economy and society with increased health care costs, poorer productivity and economic growth. And if this was not bad enough, climate change is making these challenges worse. Africa’s citizens may have done little historically to add to the carbon emissions in our atmosphere but that does not mean our continent will escape its impact. In fact, productive land and water supplies are already being reduced.

But our experience in Ghana shows just how harnessing science can help transform agricultural productivity. By giving farmers access to the latest scientific knowledge and crucially, providing them with the support to make full use of it, the results can be truly remarkable.

Cocoa production, a vital cash crop for Ghana, has been virtually tripled in a decade. There have been dramatic increases too, in cereals, and staples such as plantains, yams and cassava. Within a decade, Ghana went from a position where we failed to produce enough food to feed our own people to producing a healthy surplus for export.

As we have seen in many other parts of the world, the transformation in agriculture is a powerful driver for wider progress. Ghana became the first African country to meet its Millennium Development Goal of halving poverty seven years ahead of schedule.

While this dramatic improvement in Ghana’s agriculture is perhaps the most sustained example of national success, the achievements are by no means unique. Across Africa, where a strong partnership is being forged between science, farmers and national governments, we are seeing similar impressive results.

The task now is to strengthen and expand these partnerships, a central aim of the Pan-African Chemistry Network which is meeting in Ghana this week. I pay tribute to the Royal Society of Chemistry and Syngenta for its role in supporting this vital academic collaboration.

For there is a great deal more to do. Despite progress, farm yields in Africa still lag badly behind the global average. We need to bring together research institutes from across the continent and beyond to develop new crop strains which can flourish in African conditions.

With rains becoming more irregular, this must focus in particular on crop varieties which can thrive on less water. We need as well to develop new farming techniques which make the most of every drop of water there is. One of the major reasons why farming yields in Africa are behind those in many other parts of the world is that only a small proportion of land under cultivation is irrigated.

This offers real potential for increasing harvests. But as climate change continues and pressure on scarce resources increases, we have to find ways too, of growing more with less water. Water-related issues are compounded by a multitude of other challenges.

Transportation of foodstuffs from rural producers to cities is severely hindered by poor roads, driving prices ever higher. A lack of storage facilities means that produce often begins to rot before it can be sent to market. The inability to process foodstuffs locally forces developing nations to export their produce cheaply and purchase final products at higher costs.

The long-term solution must be to promote truly sustainable agriculture both in small-holdings, which continue to produce the majority of Africa’s food, and large-scale commercial farms. We need a combination of both working together if we are to meet the continent’s food needs now and in the future.

As this week’s conference in Accra demonstrates, we are seeing a determined effort by the scientific community to collaborate to find solutions to Africa’s agricultural problems. If we get all this right, and both national governments and donors provide the investment needed, the future for farming on our continent is bright.

John Kufuor, who was President of Ghana from 2001 to 2009, is the 2011 World Food Prize Laureate. The Pan-Africa Chemistry Network’s Forum on Agricultural Sustainability was held in Accra, Ghana, 21-23 November.

ECO-Farming: It goes back to the root of it all, but could be the future of farming


September 14, 2011

fema

U.S. net farm income is expected to increase by 31% this year to a near-record $103.6 billion on higher prices for grain, livestock and other major commodities, the USDA said in an updated forecast.

Projected income is up from $97.3 billion in a February forecast and would be the second-highest inflation-adjusted figure since 1973, according to the USDA.

graph

 

The income surge is driven partly by sharply higher revenue from corn, cotton, hay, soybeans and wheat, the USDA said. Crop receipts will rise by an estimated $33.6 billion in 2011, according to the agency.

Grain and livestock prices rallied this year amid crop shortfalls that tightened global grain stockpiles and expanding demand from growing markets such as China. Corn, cattle and hog prices reached record highs in recent months, based on Chicago futures, and soybeans and wheat are also up from previous years.

Strong commodity prices are also boosting farmland values, fueling gains in producers’ net worth and pushing their debt-to-equity ratios near historic lows.

The U.S. farm sector’s net worth is projected to rise 7.7% this year, according to the USDA, while farm business real estate values will rise an estimated 7.1%. The projected debt-to-equity ratio for 2011, at 11.6%, would match the current record low set in 2007.

Median total farm household income is expected to increase 1.9% in 2011, to $55,405, the USDA said. That’s slower than the 4.1% increase in 2010, but higher than the five-year average of 1.2%.

Grain and livestock prices remain near highs reached earlier in the year, and many analysts expect the corn market to continue rallying after extreme heat damaged crops in the Midwest over the summer.

In trading August 30, corn futures for December delivery rose 5 ¼ cents to $7.75 ¼ a bushel. That’s the highest settlement for a December corn contract since July 2008. Corn futures have more than doubled from about $3.54 in mid-2010.