Tag Archives: carbon credits

The new head of a major research organization says the key to food security is to farm smarter, not to plow more land.


May 28, 2012


frank

 Frank Rijsberman, CEO of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research

The new head of a major research organization says the key to food security is to farm smarter, not to plow more land. The strains on agriculture are growing as the global population rises and emerging economies demand more types of food.

“Agriculture had been neglected for several decades. We had become used to abundant and cheap food. And the world got a wake-up call in 2008, ’10, ’11 with spikes in food prices. And people realized that we have to produce an awful lot more food for a growing world population, as much as 70 percent by 2050,” said Frank Rijsberman, CEO of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, more commonly known as CGIAR.

Right and wrong

The world population is expected to reach 9 billion by 2050, an increase of 2 billion from the current level. But to feed that many people is it simply a matter of planting more seeds on more land?

“No, actually, that’s the wrong way to go because basically crop yields – the amount of crop that we get per hectare has sort of plateaued. It’s no longer increasing. The only thing farmers can do is indeed plow under more land and they’re doing that at an alarming pace. They’re doing that now more rapidly than during the green revolution. But if they do that they’re going to plow under marginal lands, key environmental areas. That would be quite disastrous and not a long-term sustainable path,” he said.

Rijsberman said the key is research to learn how to get greater crop output from existing agricultural land. That’s one of the main goals of CGIAR.

“There’s a lot of private sector research in agriculture, but that serves primarily the big commercial farmers. We are serving the smallholder farmers – the 500 million farmers on less than two hectares – that provide most of the food in developing countries,” he said.

Some of the organization’s key research programs include improving varieties of corn, wheat, rice, potatoes and yams, as well as fish and animals.

A second goal is to get the latest research into the hands of smallholder farmers as quickly as possible. Information such as ways to better access markets and reduce post-harvest loses. Another is to address the issues of climate change, nutrition and gender, since women account for much if not most of the agricultural production around the world.

Rijsberman said while recent spikes in food prices may not hit consumers very hard in developed countries, they can have a devastating effect in poor countries.

“The poor billions in Africa, Asia and Latin America, who spend 80, 90 percent of their income on food – if the food price goes up 10, 20 percent that has an immediate impact. Those people are more vulnerable. Just the recent food price spike from 2010/11 pushed some 44-million more people into poverty. So big impact immediately felt by the most vulnerable,” he said.

The CGIAR is getting ready for the Rio+20 conference on sustainable development. It begins June 20th in Rio de Janeiro. The meeting marks the 20th anniversary of the first so-called Earth Summit. Rijsberman says at the initial summit, agriculture and environment were opposing forces. He describes them now as “best friends.”

lady

At the recent Camp David G8 Summit, President Obama announced the New Alliance on Food and Nutrition Security. It calls for much greater investment and involvement by the private sector. Rijsberman said for Africa to reach its food security goals, agriculture investment would need to increase by $21 billion dollars per year. Most of that would have to come from the private sector.

Story by:Joe DeCapua VOA

California is expanding its carbon-trading program to three Canadian provinces


April 17, 2011

lo

The addition of British Columbia, Quebec and Ontario would create the largest cap-and-trade system in North America.

By Margot Roosevelt, Los Angeles TimesApril 13, 2011

California officials announced Tuesday that the state will expand its newly adopted carbon-trading program to three Canadian provinces, creating the largest regional cap-and-trade system in North America.

California will be joined by British Columbia, Quebec and Ontario in a cap-and-trade program aimed at limiting planet-heating greenhouse gases from industrial plants and transportation fuel, and that allows companies to buy and sell emissions allowances among themselves to cut their costs.

The Western Climate Initiative, launched by former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, was originally designed in 2008 to engage seven Western states and four Canadian provinces in a trading program. That program, it was hoped, would eventually fold into a broader federal cap-and-trade system to be enacted by Congress.

But since then, support for curbing global-warming emissions has ebbed, and the economic downturn has cut into business profits. Federal cap-and-trade legislation was passed by the House in 2009 but stalled in the Senate.

Arizona, New Mexico Washington, Oregon, Utah and Montana had signed on to join the initiative but have pulled out of the trading plan.

Quebec is expected to join California’s program when it is launched in January, with British Columbia and Ontario finalizing their rules within a year. Manitoba is also considering signing on.

“We hope this will evolve into a broader North American program,” said Michael Gibbs, deputy secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency. “Just how it gets there is an open question.”

The initiative comes as studies show climate change is taking a toll on the Western region of the U.S. and Canada. Scientists say that without dramatic cuts in the burning of fossil fuels, Western states will suffer from water shortages, severe wildfires, coastal flooding and the loss of animal and plant species.

Even without other U.S. states, the new trading program will cover two-thirds of the greenhouse gas emissions of the original 11 states and provinces, because California and Ontario are the largest regional economies by far. The Western initiative also will be three times larger than a program mounted by Northeastern U.S. states, which covers only electrical plants, Gibbs said.

Harvard University economist Robert Stavins, an authority on cap-and-trade systems, said that despite the defection of the other Western states, California “is leading the way toward a national carbon-pricing policy.” He added that the “demonization” of cap-and-trade by conservatives in Congress, who branded the system “cap-and-tax,” makes the Western regional system “of the greatest importance in influencing future congressional debates.”

 

 

 

Viterra Reaches Carbon Credit Milestone


October 26, 2010

CALGARY, ALBERTA, Oct 26, 2010 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) — Viterra Inc. (“Viterra”) /quotes/comstock/11t!e:vt (CA:VT 9.88, +0.13, +1.33%) (asx:VTA) is pleased to announce that its carbon credit program has aggregated over one million offsets, representing over $10 million paid to Alberta farmers, since its launch in March, 2008.

Viterra purchases and aggregates carbon offset credits, based on the Alberta government’s protocols for tillage system management. They are generated through no till or reduced till practices on agricultural land, which decrease greenhouse gas emissions.

“Viterra’s carbon credit program illustrates our commitment to developing solutions that bring value to our farm customers while encouraging sustainable farming practices. Reaching this milestone is a testament to the success of our program and to our employees, who work closely with our customers.” said Doug Wonnacott, Viterra’s Senior Vice-President, Agri-products.

In November, 2008, Viterra signed a long-term supply agreement with ENMAX Energy Corporation (“ENMAX Energy”), Alberta’s leading competitive electricity retailer. Through this arrangement, Viterra customers have access to a reliable market for their carbon offset credits.

“We would like to congratulate Viterra on the success of its carbon credit program. Innovative solutions such as these are excellent examples of what can be accomplished through collaboration and a shared commitment to environmental best practices,” said Corey Wilson Commercial Manager, ENMAX Energy.

Adapting agriculture to mitigate climate change


August 24, 2010

Monday, August 23, 2010

>From droughts in Mexico to floods in Pakistan and deadly heat in the US, extreme weather events are increasing due to global warming. Experts have stated concern that these could lead to instability in global agriculture markets and even conflicts over food, similar to those seen in 2007 and 2008.

In a recent report, the World Bank studied the impacts of climate change in-depth for the countries Mozambique, Ethiopia, Ghana, Bangladesh, Âu Lạc (Vietnam), Samoa, and Bolivia, and estimated that the cost for all the most vulnerable countries to adapt to climate change will be US$70-100 billion per year until 2050.

Warren Evans – Director of Environment Department at World Bank (M): The reality is that climate change is a development issue. The poorest of the poor tend to be the most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, whether it’s sea level rise, drought, flooding. They also are the least resilient because of their impoverished state.

VOICE: The World Bank’s new study was presented by Environment Department Director Warren Evans, who explained that economic development is the most cost-effective method of climate change adaptation. In particular, developing sustainable agriculture would make both adaptation and mitigation of climate change efficient, a point confirmed by a 2009 Dutch study which found that a global shift to an organic vegan diet would save world governments 80% of climate mitigation costs by 2050, or a savings of US$32 trillion.

Mr. Evans (M): Agriculture is one of the opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. There is a tremendous amount of carbon stored in soils and in grasses and so on. Right now, that is not a part of the equation in terms of getting financing to developing countries for reducing their emissions, but there’s a tremendous opportunity to shift agricultural practices, so that carbon is stored.

Supreme Master TV (F): And what kind of practices are you talking about?

Mr. Evans (M): Well, a simple one is no-till farming, where you reduce the amount of exposure of the soils to the air, to the atmosphere. You retain a higher level of organic composition and of vegetative growth on top of the soils, proven over and over again to be a highly effective system for production.

Other systems involve changing the way the water’s managed, and in some cases it’s a matter of changing crops.

VOICE: Our appreciation Director Evans and World Bank for indicating ways to support the most impacted countries in mitigating global warming. May all nations help to make rapid and effective changes to stop further climate change.

During a May 2009 videoconference in Togo, Supreme Master Ching Hai discussed organic vegan farming practices and their benefits for the planet at this crucial time.

Greenhouse gas calculator connects farming practices with carbon credits


August 12, 2010

MADISON, WI, August 9th, 2010 – Greenhouse gas markets, where invisible gases are traded, must seem like black boxes to most people. Farmers can make money on these markets, such as the Chicago Climate Exchange, by installing methane capture technologies in animal-based systems, no-till farming, establishing grasslands, and planting trees.

Farmers, students, extension educators, offset aggregators, and other stakeholders need to understand how to change farming practices to maximize their potential economic returns in these new markets.

To open the black box, researchers at the W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, including Claire P. McSwiney, Sven Bohm, Peter R. Grace, and G. Philip Robertson, developed the Farming Systems Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculator, a simple web-based tool to help users make economically and environmentally sound decisions.

The first page of the calculator asks users to choose a county of interest from anywhere in the US. An input/output window allows them to choose which crops they will grow, yields, tillage practices, and nitrogen fertilizer rates. Default values based on localized USDA statistics are provided as a starting point.

Given the farming practices chosen, the calculator tells the user how much carbon was stored in the soil or lost to the atmosphere, nitrous oxide (a greenhouse gas 300 times more potent than carbon dioxide) lost from the soil in response to fertilizer application, carbon dioxide produced by tractors, and carbon dioxide produced in manufacturing the fertilizer.

In an article in the 2010 Journal of Natural Resources and Life Science Education, published by the American Society of Agronomy, the Crop Science Society of America, and the Soil Science Society of America, the authors used the calculator to demonstrate how tillage compares with no-till in a three-year rotation of corn, soybean, and wheat.

Whether tilled or untilled, corn years always had the largest greenhouse gas losses due to large fertilizer additions.

(Photo Credit: Claire P. McSwiney)

Whether tilled or untilled, corn years always had the largest greenhouse gas losses due to large fertilizer additions. Wheat requires less fertilizer and soybeans require none. No-till management reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 50% due to soil carbon storage.

In another comparison, the amount of fertilizer applied was changed from 134 to 101 kg. Such a reduction could be achieved without a yield penalty by more precisely applying fertilizers or by using new fertilizer recommendations. Excess nitrogen in soil is readily transformed to nitrous oxide. By simply reducing fertilizer applications, the cropping system reduced greenhouse gas emissions 12%.

In an Environmental Science class at Kalamazoo College, the authors used the calculator for an in-class exercise. Using the farming systems calculator allowed students to take control and make the management changes they had been discussing for weeks. By making the management decisions themselves and ‘seeing’ what happened to soil carbon, the connections between changes in farm practices and the potential for economic gain became much clearer.

Farmers and other agricultural professionals can use the program to participate in similar exercises. By comparing different cropping scenarios against one another, the practices with the most promise for mitigating atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations become readily apparent. Those not familiar with agriculture learn how certain farming practices can have a positive environmental impact.

Vesco Agricultural Technologies…Setting a new standard in No-Till farming equipment. Legal and Legislative factors


July 13, 2010

Washington_DC_Capitol

Farming has generally been an unregulated activity. The primary legal and legislative involvement has been in the approval and regulation of chemical sprays and fertilizers. That is now changing.

Farmers are finding that environmental concerns are leading to legal and legislative impacts on their business activities. This fact was highlighted as long ago as February 11, 1996, in a New York Times article. The article noted “Farmers have received billions of dollars in income annually because of subsidies. Increasingly, though, the Government has sought to control these outlays with a complicated web of restrictions.” Regulation now dictates to farmers what land they can grow crops upon, what acreage must be reduced and even what crops can be produced. Each successive US Farm Bill, discussed in the US Senate and House further highlights this fact.

In many countries, such as Brazil, legislation has already been implemented that mandates the use of conservation or no-tillage practices. Similar legislation is expected in Canada and the United States. In fact, legislation is proposed or has passed and is awaiting implementation, in many Provinces and States in Canada and the United States, which will affect a wide range of farming activities. The regulatory approach to improving the environment is a growing trend that will significantly benefit those farmers who comply with new regulations and will significantly benefit companies such as Vesco Agricultural Technologies that have technology that will assist farmers to comply.

For more informaion on Vesco please visite: www.vescocanada.com

No-Till Farming May Be Best Way to Reduce Ag’s Carbon Footprint


July 8, 2010

by Kristen Ridley

There’s been a lot of talk about the benefits of open pasture with grass-fed livestock to the environment, particularly about it’s capacity to sequester tons of carbon, but what about non-animal agriculture? As I recently reported, soil cultivation is responsible for the majority of agricultural carbon emissions, and over-cultivation is one of the leading contributors to the alarming spread of desertification.

 

What, then, is the most environmentally-friendly way to grow vegetables? No-till farming.

Traditional planting requires farmers to till the soil at least once a year, eliminating weeds, turning cover crops into the soil, aiding in the breakdown of organic matter, reducing soil compaction, and preparing the grounds for planting. Unfortunately, plowing also releases a huge amount of carbon into the atmosphere, making it one of the major contributors to global warming. It also leads to soil erosion and runoff, degrading the land and polluting waterways.

Continue reading

Farming carbon as a cash crop


July 7, 2010

Kathleen O’Hara

Like most city dwellers, my knowledge of farming is embarrassingly limited. But a conference on agriculture and global warming has inspired me to dig deeper (pun intended) into things rural.

The speaker who grabbed my urban-oriented attention was American-born, U.K.-based Craig Sams, co-founder of Green and Black’s organic chocolate bars. His message was, well, grounding.

“When we talk about food and farming we are talking about carbon,” Sams pointed out. “The process by which food is made starts with carbon dioxide and nitrogen from the atmosphere and turns it into protein, fat, and carbohydrates. Plants conjure food out of thin air with help from water and sunshine …”

Even better: “Of all the carbon capture and storage technologies on the planet, none can ever hope to be more efficient than photosynthesis … It’s absurdly cheap and has been tested for millions of years …”

Sadly, the brilliance of nature has been tarnished by the short-sightedness of humanity.

Sams was born on a farm in Nebraska. In the 1880s, when his great-grandfather first plowed the prairie, the topsoil was four metres deep. Now it’s less than one metre and “shrinking.”

Every tonne of soil that Sams’ great-grandfather plowed contained about 50 per cent carbon and 5 per cent nitrogen. During erosion, that tonne reacted with oxygen in the air and produced about three tons of carbon dioxide, along with the more damaging nitrous oxide – equivalent to another 30 tonnes of carbon dioxide.

Sams said that his great-grandfather lost about four tonnes of soil per acre annually, “so over 160 acres he emitted 21,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide from our little farm. Every year.”

That was in the days of horsepower. “In the 1930s, when oil sold for 10 cents a barrel and tractors began replacing horses, production went up, plows went deeper, and soil erosion went crazy.” The result was the Dust Bowl.

Sams pointed out that half of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions from 1850 to 1990 came from agricultural activity, but therein lies the good news.

“There are 1.5 billion hectares of arable land on the planet and if you just saved one tonne of carbon emissions per year per hectare that would give us a 1.5 billion tonnes emission reduction. If you went further and instituted practices that captured and locked carbon in the soil, then you would have another 1.5 billion tonnes reduction, giving a total of 3 billion tonnes per year of carbon reduction.”

This would cover more than half of the 80 per cent emissions reductions we need to stabilize our climate, he told us.

If this principle were extended to the 9 per cent of the Earth’s surface that is farmed as pasture or grazing scrubland, then we could more than double that figure – and agriculture alone could bring about all the emissions reductions we need.

“Agriculture has always been a big part of the problem. It has more potential than any other industry to be the biggest part of the solution.”

Sams said that society must offer farmers price incentives to farm “not just organic, but carbon-conscious organic.” They should be rewarded for removing carbon from the atmosphere by the plants they grow. If they got a good price for every tonne of carbon they sequestered, “they would see carbon as their primary product.”

“We are at war with an enemy, greenhouse gas …” Sams concluded. “We can win it and farming is our most powerful weapon.”

Who would have thought that the solution to the Earth’s problems lay in the earth itself? And on our plates.

Kathleen O’Hara is a Canadian journalist currently based in London.

Securing carbon in our soil


July 6, 2010

By Nicole Schuetz

Better farming practices can improve crop yield and lock up greenhouse gases

Everybody knows plants store carbon. But soils do too.

That’s the idea behind organic no-till farming, a cultivation technique that could dramatically increase soil carbon storage across the globe.

Research has shown organic farming methods sequester more carbon per acre than fossil fuel-based conventional methods. While scientists are still fleshing out the reasons for this, one likely cause is the increased level of mycorrhizal fungi in organically managed plots. These microscopic fungi literally help “glue” soil particles together, which traps organic carbon, nutrients, and water in the soil for the long haul.

Similarly, no-till farming preserves soil carbon storage through the thick crop root systems that develop when tillage is dramatically reduced. The combination of the two methods is now being studied by the Rodale Institute for its potential to produce even more climate benefits.

The early results are striking: compared to conventional farming techniques, which result in 300 lbs of carbon emissions per acre each year, Rodale’s research (pdf) suggests that organic no-till farming combined with utilizing compost as a natural fertilizer could store over a ton of carbon per acre per year in the ground.

The best part? Crop yields are likely to remain the same or even increase under organic no-till management. Rodale’s long-term comparison study of organic and conventional methods showed no difference in yields between the two farming techniques in normal years, and increased yields in organic plots during drought years (thanks to all those mycorrhizal fungi holding water and carbon in long-term storage). The variety of other benefits generated by organic no-till farming — from reducing nutrient runoff and erosion to decreasing fuel and fertilizer cost — are icing on the cake.

Disappearing dirt rivals global warming as an environmental threat


July 5, 2010

The lowdown on topsoil: It’s disappearing

By TOM PAULSON

 

The planet is getting skinned.

While many worry about the potential consequences of atmospheric warming, a few experts are trying to call attention to another global crisis quietly taking place under our feet.

Call it the thin brown line. Dirt. On average, the planet is covered with little more than 3 feet of topsoil — the shallow skin of nutrient-rich matter that sustains most of our food and appears to play a critical role in supporting life on Earth.

“We’re losing more and more of it every day,” said David Montgomery, a geologist at the University of Washington. “The estimate is that we are now losing about 1 percent of our topsoil every year to erosion, most of this caused by agriculture.”

“It’s just crazy,” fumed John Aeschliman, a fifth-generation farmer who grows wheat and other grains on the Palouse near the tiny town of Almota, just west of Pullman.

“We’re tearing up the soil and watching tons of it wash away every year,” Aeschliman said. He’s one of a growing number of farmers trying to persuade others to adopt “no-till” methods, which involve not tilling the land between plantings, leaving crop stubble to reduce erosion and planting new seeds between the stubble rows.

Montgomery has written a popular book, “Dirt,” to call public attention to what he believes is a neglected environmental catastrophe. A geomorphologist who studies how landscapes form, Montgomery describes modern agricultural practices as “soil mining” to emphasize that we are rapidly outstripping the Earth’s natural rate of restoring topsoil.

“Globally, it’s clear we are eroding soils at a rate much faster than they can form,” said John Reganold, a soils scientist at Washington State University. “It’s hard to get people to pay much attention to this because, frankly, most of us take soil for granted.”

The National Academy of Sciences has determined that cropland in the U.S. is being eroded at least 10 times faster than the time it takes for lost soil to be replaced.

The United Nations has warned of worldwide soil degradation — especially in sub-Saharan Africa, where soil loss has contributed to the rapidly increasing number of malnourished people.

Healthy topsoil is a biological matrix, a housing complex for an incredibly diverse community of organisms — billions of beneficial microbes per handful, nitrogen-fixing fungi, nutrients and earthworms whose digestive tracts transform the fine grains of sterile rock and plant detritus into the fertile excrement that gave rise to the word itself (“drit,” in Old Norse).

As such, true living topsoil cannot be made overnight, Montgomery emphasized. Topsoil grows back at a rate of an inch or two over hundreds of years. Very slowly.

“Globally, it’s pretty clear we’re running out of dirt,” Montgomery said.

Ron Myhrum, state soil scientist with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s office in Spokane, agreed that global soil loss is a huge problem. But Myhrum said erosion rates in the Northwest region have improved recently because of better conservation farming practices, including federal payments to farmers to leave some natural ground cover in highly erodible areas.

“We don’t have the kind of dust storms here we used to have,” Myhrum said. “What’s more alarming to me than erosion is conversion of farmland to urban use.”

That is indeed another way to lose soil — paving it over. Judy Herring, manager of King County’s farmland preservation program, said the county has lost 60 percent of its farmland since the 1960s. In 1979, Herring said, voters approved a bond program that buys back farmland to protect it from development (and has done this for 13,200 acres so far).

But while some land is lost to development, pollution or changing weather patterns, Montgomery, Reganold and others say global soil loss is a crisis mostly rooted in agriculture.

“Erosion rates have improved here, but that doesn’t mean they’re good,” Reganold said. Topsoil clearly is still being stripped off faster than it can be regenerated, he said.

Aeschliman, the Palouse farmer, a stocky and energetic man who doesn’t seem to notice that he’s in his 60s, stood on a dirt road looking at the difference between his land and that of a neighbor. Because most neighbors are relatives, he did not provide any names here.

“Just look at that!” he bellowed, pointing to a series of water-carved cracks and gouges running down a recently tilled field of wheat. Every year, he said, these fields are tilled and the rains come, washing the soil down into the road so deep the county routinely has to dig it out. The rest of the soil runs off to the Snake River and, eventually, to the Pacific.

“Here, look at this stuff,” Aeschliman said as he held up a handful of the fine brown silt that had eroded off his neighbor’s (cousin’s) hillside. “Now, look over here.”

He walked across the road to his no-till wheat field. Unlike the rolling hills of loose dirt on the tilled field, Aeschliman’s field looks more like a shag rug, with its rows of dead wheat stubble. He reached down into the dirt and pulled out a coarsely textured, much darker clump of dirt, roots and debris.

“This soil is full of worms, bacteria and all sorts of life,” Aeschliman said. “And it stays put. That stuff over there (waving his thick hand back behind him) is just powder, brown dust. It’s dead. There’s no worms, no life in it.”

Thirty years ago, Aeschliman was one of the first in the Palouse to grow his grains using no-till farming methods. He’s an ardent no-till proselytizer today, but he didn’t abandon tilling the fields based on some organic epiphany or desire to save the world.

“I just got tired of all the mud,” Aeschliman said. The family home, built in the 1880s, sits at the base of a long drainage off the rolling wheat fields. Every spring, with the tilling and the rain, his home would be a foot deep in muddy runoff.

No-till farming could do a lot to reduce topsoil erosion, Reganold said, but it’s not without its downsides. Switching to no-till farming requires heavy upfront investment and learning new techniques, he said, and also tends to depend more on herbicides because the weeds are no longer controllable by plowing them into the soil.

Organic farming methods also can reduce soil loss, Reganold said. He cited his own research, which has shown a marked increase in soil health, water retention and regrowth when organic methods are used rather than the traditional methods.

A regional association of farmers and other proponents of no-till agriculture, also known as direct-seed farming, is holding its annual meeting in Kennewick next week. Aeschliman is one of the founders of the organization, the Pacific Northwest Direct Seed Association, and is happy to see that no-till farming is growing in popularity.

“It’s both good for the soil and good for your pocketbook,” he said.

Sub Story by Marvelle Media:

The world is facing an agricultural crisis of pandemic proportions: the catastrophic loss of topsoil. After covering the earth for thousands of years, the world’s topsoil is being lost at an alarming rate. In reality, for the past 100 years, our land has been more ‘mined’ than farmed. Historically, farmers used the soil, depleted the soil and moved on. Even with current farming methods more topsoil disappears each year than is created.

Such poor management of the topsoil is not the failure of a single farm or even a single region. It’s a problem of worldwide dimension. Across the globe, world agriculture faces a growing crisis. The world’s four top crop-producing areas (U.S.A., the countries of the former USSR, China and India) are all losing topsoil at an alarming rate of over 13 billion plus tons per year.

Sediment from soil erosion is the single greatest pollutant of the world’s oceans, lakes and rivers. Scientists estimate that before intensive agricultural cultivation began, approximately 9 billion tons of topsoil was carried into our waterways annually through runoff. Today the volume has tripled, exceeding 27 billion tons every year, and continues to increase.

Vesco Agricultural Technologies has developed superior No-Till farming equipment that produces higher yields, combats soil erosion, reduces seed, fertilizer and fuel costs and qualifies for carbon-offset credits, tradable on the growing number of carbon credit markets emerging worldwide as part of the fight against Climate Change.

Conventional agriculture is a key contributor to man-made climate change and environmental degradation. The pressure to improve crop efficiencies and reduce GHG emissions is expected to continue to receive significant and increasing global attention and investment.

The product of many years of research and development, the patented Terra-GlideTM precision planting system offers significant technological advances in No-Till farming and is expected to become the industry standard in No-Till agriculture.

for more info visit www.vescocanada.com